Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules

نویسندگان

چکیده

It is common for people to remark that a particular argument strong (or weak) argument. Having handle on the relative strengths of arguments can help in deciding which consider, regard as acceptable, and present others discussion. In computational models argument, there need deeper understanding strength. multidimensional problem, this paper, we focus one aspect strength deductive argumentation based defeasible logic. We assume probability distribution over language consider how are various ways calculate probabilistic necessity sufficiency premises claim, competing claims. provide axioms characterizing probability-based measures strength, investigate four specific measures.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Argumentation-Based Defeasible Reasoning For Existential Rules

Logic based argumentation allows for defeasible reasoning over monotonic logics. In this paper, we introduce DEFT, a tool implementing argumentative defeasible reasoning over existential rules. We explain how DEFT overcomes derivation loss and discuss DEFT’s empirical behavior.

متن کامل

On Argumentation with Purely Defeasible Rules

aspic is one of the most widely used systems for structured arguments and includes the use of both strict and defeasible rules. Here we consider using just the defeasible part of aspic. We show that using the resulting system, it is possible, in a well defined sense, to capture the same information as using aspic with strict rules.

متن کامل

Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation

The present paper discusses experimental argument assistance tools. In contrast with automated reasoning tools, the objective is not to replace reasoning, but to guide the user’s production of arguments. Two systems are presented, ARGUE! and ARGUMED based on DEFLOG. The focus is on defeasible argumentation with an eye on the law. Argument assistants for defeasible argumentation naturally corres...

متن کامل

Probabilistic Argument Graphs for Argumentation Lotteries

Uncertainty about which arguments or attacks should appear in an argument graph means that there is uncertainty as to the structure of the argument graph. When informal arguments are presented, there may be imprecision in the language used, and so the audience may be uncertain as to the structure of the argument graph as intended by the presenter of the arguments. For a presenter of arguments, ...

متن کامل

Web Based System for Weighted Defeasible Argumentation

In a previous work we defined a recursive semantics for reasoning about which arguments should be warranted when extending Defeasible Argumentation with defeasibility levels for arguments. Our approach is based on a general notion of collective conflict among arguments and on the fact that if an argument is warranted it must be that all its subarguments also are warranted. An output of a progra...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1873-4731', '0888-613X']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2022.04.003